Can I Be a Tax Resident in Both the U.S. and Korea? — 2026
Hanmi CPA · Cross-Border Tax Guide

Can I Be a Tax Resident in Both the U.S. and Korea? — Dual Residency
미국과 한국의 이중 세법상 거주자 — 2026 한국 세법 개정 반영

U.S. residency tests (Green Card + SPT), 2026 Korean residency rule changes (new cross-year 183-day rule), U.S.–Korea Treaty tie-breaker, worldwide income obligations in both countries, Foreign Tax Credit mechanics, and FBAR/FATCA vs. Korean overseas account reporting — with four real-case scenarios.

Dual Residency 2026 KR New 183-Day Rule Treaty Tie-Breaker FTC Form 1116 FBAR $10K

Overview — What Dual Residency Means 이중 거주자의 의미

Yes — a person can be a tax resident of both the United States and South Korea simultaneously. This is called "dual residency," and it is common for Korean nationals working in the U.S., Korean-Americans spending significant time in Korea, and green card holders who live or work in Korea.

🇺🇸 United States

U.S. Tax Residency → Form 1040

  • Worldwide income must be reported
  • FBAR (FinCEN 114) — Korean accounts
  • FATCA Form 8938 — Korean assets
  • Foreign Tax Credit available for Korean taxes paid
  • Applies to green card holders and SPT-meeting individuals
🇰🇷 South Korea

Korean Tax Residency → 종합소득세

  • Worldwide income must be reported (거주자: 전세계 소득)
  • 해외금융계좌 신고 — overseas account reporting (>50M KRW)
  • Year-end settlement (연말정산) applies to employees
  • Korean tax filing deadline: May 31 (종합소득세 신고)
  • New 2026 cross-year 183-day rule
⚠ However — You Cannot Be a Treaty Resident of Both Countries Simultaneously: While dual residency can exist under each country's domestic law, the U.S.–Korea Tax Treaty provides a tie-breaker mechanism that assigns treaty residency to one country or the other. Claiming treaty non-residency modifies some obligations — but not all. Crucially, treaty non-residency under the tie-breaker does not eliminate FBAR obligations for U.S. tax residents.

U.S. Tax Residency Rules 미국 세법상 거주자 판정

The U.S. uses two independent tests. Meeting either test makes a person a U.S. tax resident for the entire calendar year (or from the residency starting date in a dual-status year).

Test 1 — Green Card Test 영주권 테스트
Any lawful permanent resident (LPR) = U.S. tax resident for the full year
Applies regardless of physical location or time spent in the U.S. A green card holder living full-time in Korea is still a U.S. tax resident. Ends only upon formal abandonment (Form I-407) or a court order of removal. Treaty claims do not constitute abandonment — but carry severe immigration risk.
Test 2 — Substantial Presence Test (SPT) 실질적 체류 테스트
≥ 31 days in current year AND [current year × 1] + [prior year × ⅓] + [two years ago × ⅙] ≥ 183
Applies to H-1B, L-1, E-2, O-1, TN, B-1/B-2, and F-1/J-1 after exemption years end. Does not apply to diplomats (A/G visas) or F-1/J-1 students during their first 5 calendar years. Even short cumulative U.S. presence across multiple years can trigger SPT residency unexpectedly.

Korean Tax Residency Rules — 2026 Changes 한국 세법상 거주자 — 2026 개정

South Korea determines tax residency based on domicile (주소) or place of residence (거소). Korean tax residents are subject to worldwide income taxation; non-residents pay tax only on Korean-source income.

Korean Residency — Four Bases (All Current Law)
1. Domicile (주소): Permanent center of life in Korea
A person whose family, home, and economic life are permanently in Korea has a Korean domicile — even if they work abroad. The NTS considers: location of spouse and dependents, ownership or lease of Korean real estate, Korean business activities, Korean financial assets, and intent to return. A Korean national working in the U.S. on H-1B who owns a Korean apartment and whose spouse and children remain in Korea may be deemed to have a Korean domicile.
2. 183-Day Rule (단일 연도): 183+ days in Korea in a single calendar year
The standard physical presence test. Any person present in Korea for 183 or more days in a single calendar year (January 1 – December 31) is a Korean tax resident. Arrival and departure days both count.
3. NEW 2026 — Cross-Year 183-Day Rule: 183+ consecutive days spanning two tax years
Effective January 1, 2026 (2024 Korean Tax Law Amendment): A person who resides in Korea for 183 or more consecutive days spanning two consecutive calendar years is now treated as a Korean tax resident. For example: a person present in Korea from July 1, 2025 through January 31, 2026 (215 consecutive days across two calendar years) is now a Korean tax resident beginning in 2025. This new rule captures Korean-Americans and expatriates who split the year between Korea and abroad but accumulate more than 6 months of consecutive Korea presence across year-end.
4. Constructive Residency — Occupation, Family, Assets
Persons whose occupation normally requires 183+ days in Korea, or who have a spouse or dependents in Korea with substantial Korean assets, may be deemed residents regardless of actual day count. Even when a person has a job overseas and stayed there for more than 183 days, if their general living relationships (family, property) are in Korea, they can still be classified as Korean residents.
2026 Korean Tax Law — New Cross-Year Rule (2024 Amendment): Prior to 2026, Korean tax residency required 183+ days in a single calendar year. Beginning January 1, 2026, Korea also recognizes residency based on 183 consecutive days spanning two consecutive tax years. This specifically targets Korean-Americans who spend half the year in Korea (e.g., July–January), which previously may not have triggered Korean residency under the single-year rule. Korean-Americans planning extended stays in Korea should now track days carefully across year boundaries — not just within a single calendar year.

When Dual Residency Occurs 이중 거주자가 되는 경우

Dual residency arises when a person simultaneously meets U.S. residency criteria (Green Card Test or SPT) and Korean residency criteria (domicile, 183-day, or constructive residency). The following situations commonly produce dual residency:

Situation U.S. Residency Basis Korean Residency Basis Dual Residency?
Green card holder living in Korea Green Card Test (automatic) Domicile or 183-day rule Yes — almost always
H-1B worker, family stays in Korea, summers in Korea SPT (U.S. work days accumulate) Domicile (family, property in Korea); possibly 183-day cross-year rule Yes — NTS likely views as Korean resident
Korean executive rotating Seoul–U.S. (150 U.S. days, 200 Korea days) SPT based on 3-year weighted formula 183-day rule (200 Korea days in current year) Yes — treaty tie-breaker needed
Korean-American spending July–January in Korea (new 2026 rule) U.S. citizen — always U.S. resident New cross-year 183-day rule (consecutive days spanning year-end) Yes — new 2026 Korean rule now triggers Korean residency
H-1B worker with no Korean family, no Korean property SPT (U.S. work days) Generally not — no domicile, no 183 Korean days Usually No — confirm with NTS analysis

U.S.–Korea Tax Treaty Tie-Breaker 미한 조세조약 거주지 결정

Article 3 of the U.S.–Korea Income Tax Treaty provides a "tie-breaker" mechanism for determining a single country of treaty residence when a person qualifies as a tax resident of both countries under their respective domestic laws. The tie-breaker is applied sequentially — each test is applied only if the preceding test does not resolve the question.

1
Permanent Home 항구적 거주지
The country where the person has a permanent home available at all times — not temporary accommodation. If a permanent home exists in only one country, that country is the treaty resident. If in both countries, apply Test 2.
2
Center of Vital Interests 생활의 중심
The country with which the person's personal and economic relations are closer: family location, social and cultural ties, professional activities, property location, business activities. Usually the most dispositive test in practice. A Korean national on H-1B whose spouse, children, parents, and apartment are in Korea — even while working in the U.S. — typically has their center of vital interests in Korea.
3
Habitual Abode 통상적 거소
The country where the person more habitually resides — the country where they spend more time under normal circumstances, not counting extraordinary visits. Applied when permanent home and vital interests tests are inconclusive (e.g., permanent homes in both countries, family in both countries).
4
Nationality 국적
If the person is a citizen (national) of only one of the treaty countries, that country determines treaty residency. Korean citizen with U.S. green card: Korean national — Korea wins on nationality test. U.S. citizen with Korean permanent residency: U.S. national — the treaty tie-breaker does not override U.S. citizenship for U.S. tax purposes.
5
Mutual Agreement 상호 합의
The competent authorities of both countries (IRS and Korean NTS) negotiate a determination. Used only when none of the prior four tests resolves the question — extremely rare in practice.

Claiming Treaty Tie-Breaker — Form 8833 (U.S. Side)

  • To claim treaty non-resident status in the U.S. under the tie-breaker, file Form 8833(Treaty-Based Return Position Disclosure) with the U.S. tax return. Disclose the treaty article, the factual basis for the claim, and the treaty country of residence.
  • A $1,000 penalty applies for failure to file Form 8833 when required. The claim is not self-executing — IRS reviews the factual basis.
⚠ Critical Warning for Green Card Holders and H-1B Workers: Claiming treaty non-resident status by filing Form 8833 while holding a green card is legally permissible — but USCIS may treat it as evidence of intent to abandon LPR status, potentially leading to denial of re-entry or removal proceedings. H-1B workers claiming treaty non-residency create an inconsistency with their immigration status (present specifically to work in the U.S.). Form 8833 should never be filed by anyone on a work visa or with a green card without first consulting both a CPA and an immigration attorney. The immigration risk often outweighs the tax savings.

Treaty Limits — FBAR Still Applies 조약 비거주자 주장의 한계

Claiming treaty non-resident status under the tie-breaker does not eliminate all U.S. compliance obligations. The treaty affects income tax treatment — but several reporting obligations persist regardless of treaty position.

Obligation Treaty Non-Resident Claim (Form 8833) Reason
FBAR (FinCEN 114) Still required for U.S. persons FBAR is governed by the Bank Secrecy Act — not IRC §7701(b) residency. "U.S. person" for FBAR includes green card holders and citizens regardless of treaty position.
FATCA Form 8938 May still apply depending on residency position claimed FATCA applies to "specified persons" — which includes U.S. citizens and residents. Treaty non-resident claims may reduce but not eliminate all FATCA obligations.
Worldwide income on Form 1040 Reduced — only U.S.-source income taxable if treaty non-resident claim is accepted Treaty non-residency changes income scope from worldwide to U.S.-source only, which is the primary tax benefit of the tie-breaker claim.
Form 1040-NR filing May be required instead of Form 1040 If treaty non-resident position is claimed, the appropriate return for U.S.-source income may change to Form 1040-NR.
Form 3520 (Foreign Trusts / Gifts) May be reduced Depends on the specific facts; trust reporting rules may be modified by treaty position but not always eliminated.
FBAR Continues Regardless of Treaty Position: This surprises many taxpayers who assume that claiming treaty non-resident status eliminates their FBAR obligation. It does not. A Korean national who is a U.S. green card holder and claims Korean treaty residency under Form 8833 still must file the FBAR for all foreign financial accounts (including U.S. accounts held at Korean banks or Korean accounts) where the aggregate exceeded $10,000 at any point during the year. The FBAR is a Bank Secrecy Act reporting requirement — not an income tax obligation — and is not modified by treaty elections.

Foreign Tax Credit — Avoiding Double Taxation 외국납부세액공제 이중과세 방지

When both the U.S. and Korea tax the same income, the Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is the primary mechanism for eliminating or reducing double taxation. Both countries provide an FTC — Korea taxes paid can credit against U.S. tax on the same income, and U.S. taxes paid can credit against Korean tax on the same income.

U.S. Foreign Tax Credit — Form 1116

  • Dollar-for-dollar credit: Korean income tax paid on Korean-source income is creditable against U.S. tax on the same income, dollar-for-dollar. For example: $30,000 in Korean income taxes paid on a Korean salary credits directly against the U.S. income tax liability on that same Korean salary.
  • Limitation — foreign tax credit cannot exceed U.S. tax on foreign income: The credit is limited to the proportional U.S. tax on foreign-source income. Excess credits carry back 1 year and forward 10 years.
  • Passive vs. general basket: FTC is calculated separately for "passive income" (dividends, interest, royalties, capital gains) and "general income" (wages, business income). Korean salary is general basket; Korean investment income is passive basket. The two baskets cannot cross-apply.
  • Korean rates are generally comparable to U.S. rates: Korea's top marginal rate is 45% (plus local income tax ~4.4% = ~49.5% effective top rate). U.S. rates are 37% federal. For Korean residents paying at Korean rates on Korean income, the FTC usually eliminates most or all U.S. tax on that Korean income — since the Korean tax paid typically exceeds the U.S. tax owed on the same income.

Korean Foreign Tax Credit — 외국납부세액공제

  • Korea also provides a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes paid on foreign-source income. U.S. taxes paid on U.S.-source income (wages, capital gains, dividends) can be credited against Korean tax on the same income when Korea has taxing rights under the treaty.
  • The Korean FTC calculation follows similar limitation rules — the credit cannot exceed the Korean tax on the foreign-source income.
FTC Illustration — Korean National on H-1B, Dual Resident
Korean salary from Korean employer (work performed in Korea): 80,000,000 KRW ≈ $60,000 Subject to both U.S. (worldwide income) and Korean income tax
Korean income tax on $60,000 (estimated, blended ~25% effective rate) ≈ $15,000 Korean tax paid
U.S. income tax on $60,000 at 22% bracket (after deductions) ≈ $13,200 U.S. tax owed
U.S. FTC: credit Korean taxes paid ($15,000) against U.S. tax ($13,200) Credit limited to $13,200 (U.S. tax on the income)
Net U.S. tax on Korean salary after FTC $0 (Korean tax exceeded U.S. tax)
Excess FTC ($15,000 − $13,200 = $1,800) carries forward up to 10 years Can offset future years' U.S. tax on foreign income

FEIE — Option for U.S. Citizens Living in Korea 해외근로소득공제 — 재한 미국 시민권자

U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents who live and work in Korea may choose between the Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) and the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (FEIE) to reduce U.S. tax on Korean employment income. The FEIE excludes a specified amount of foreign earned income from U.S. gross income — rather than crediting foreign taxes paid.

  • 2026 FEIE exclusion amount: $132,900(indexed for inflation from $130,000 in 2025). Applies to wages and self-employment income earned in a foreign country — not to investment income, rental income, or passive income.
  • Qualification — Physical Presence Test: Must be present outside the U.S. for at least 330 full days in any 12-month period beginning or ending in the tax year. Days in the U.S. for any reason break the 330-day count.
  • Qualification — Bona Fide Residence Test: Alternatively, must be a bona fide resident of a foreign country for an uninterrupted period that includes an entire tax year.
  • FEIE or FTC — not both on the same income: The FEIE and FTC cannot both apply to the same dollars of excluded income. For most U.S. citizens in Korea — where Korean tax rates often exceed U.S. rates — the FTC is generally more advantageous than the FEIE, because excess Korean taxes can create carryforward FTCs while the FEIE simply excludes income without preserving any credit benefit.
  • FEIE does not reduce FBAR or Korean reporting obligations.

Reporting Requirements — Both Countries 양국 신고 의무 비교

Obligation U.S. Filing Korean Filing Threshold
Annual income tax return Form 1040 (resident) or 1040-NR (non-resident) 종합소득세 신고 (May 31) or 연말정산 (January, employer-processed) Any U.S. income above filing threshold; any Korean income
Overseas account reporting FBAR (FinCEN 114) by April 15 / Oct 15 extension 해외금융계좌 신고 (Korean FBAR) by June 30 US: aggregate $10,000+ / KR: 50 million KRW ($37,000+) at any point
Foreign asset reporting FATCA Form 8938 — foreign financial assets No direct equivalent — but foreign income must be reported on Korean return US: $50K/$100K (single/MFJ) year-end or $75K/$150K at any time
Foreign trust reporting Form 3520 (U.S. side) 해외신탁 신고 (Korean overseas trust statement — NEW 2026) US: gifts $100K+; KR: any overseas trust
Passive foreign investments Form 8621 (PFIC — e.g., Korean mutual funds) Korean resident must report foreign fund income US: any PFIC interest; KR: any foreign income
2026 New Korean Overseas Trust Reporting Requirement: Effective for the 2025 tax year (filed in 2026), Korean tax residents who established or maintained an overseas trust at any point during 2025 must file an "Overseas Trust Statement" with the NTS by June 30, 2026. This is a new 2024 Korean Tax Law Amendment requirement — Korean residents with Korean-American estate planning trusts, offshore asset protection trusts, or foreign investment trusts must comply with this new obligation in addition to any U.S. Form 3520 requirements.

4 Real Scenarios — Fully Analyzed 실제 사례 4개

Case 01 Green Card Holder Living Full-Time in Korea Dual Resident

A Korean national obtained a green card in 2019 through family sponsorship. Returned to Korea in 2021 for work. Has not been in the U.S. since 2021. Korean salary: approximately $90,000/year. Korean apartment owned. Korean bank accounts aggregate $200,000. U.S. tax returns not filed since 2021.

Dual Residency Analysis
U.S. residency basis Green Card Test — automatic, every year green card is held
Korean residency basis Korean domicile (permanent home, job, life center in Korea)
Treaty tie-breaker result Permanent home + vital interests → Korea. But claiming Form 8833 = severe immigration risk (potential LPR abandonment).
FBAR obligation Required: $200,000 Korean accounts exceeded $10,000 aggregate threshold in every year since 2021
U.S. filing obligation Form 1040 required for 2021–2026 (every year green card held). Korean salary must be reported — offset by Foreign Tax Credit on Form 1116.
Delinquency status (2021–2026) 6 years of unfiled U.S. returns; 6 years of FBAR non-compliance. Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP) may provide penalty relief if non-willful.
U.S. Tax Result
FTC on Form 1116 typically eliminates most U.S. income tax on the Korean salary (Korean rates ~25%+ effective; U.S. rates ~22%–24% on same income). Net U.S. tax may be $0 or small. But FBAR penalties for unfiled years can be $10,000 per year per non-willful violation — totaling $60,000+ for 6 years.
Korean Tax Result
Korean tax has been withheld via employer's 연말정산. Korean obligations are generally met. NTS is aware of Korean income; no Korean penalty expected if employer withheld correctly.
Recommended Action
Do NOT simply file Form 8833 to claim treaty non-residency — the immigration risk to the green card is severe. Instead: (1) consult an immigration attorney about whether the green card is still valid; (2) if valid and worth keeping, file delinquent U.S. returns under the IRS Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP) — 3-year return filing + 6-year FBAR filing + 5% penalty on highest account balance; (3) if green card is not worth keeping, formally surrender via Form I-407 before any tax action.
Case 02 H-1B Worker — Family in Korea, Summers in Korea Likely Dual Resident

A Korean software engineer on H-1B earns $150,000 in the U.S. Wife and two children live in Korea (wife does not work). Own a Korean apartment. Engineer visits Korea for 3 months each summer (90 days). 275 days in the U.S. per year.

Dual Residency Analysis
U.S. residency basis SPT easily met (275 U.S. days × 1 = 275 > 183)
Korean residency basis Korean domicile: wife and children in Korea; Korean apartment. NTS likely views as Korean resident. Possibly constructive residency under family/asset rules.
Treaty tie-breaker: Permanent home Has a Korean apartment (permanent home in Korea). U.S. housing is rental accommodation — potentially not "permanent home" in treaty sense. If only permanent home is in Korea: Korea wins — treaty resident of Korea.
Filing Form 8833 risk H-1B status creates inconsistency. Immigration advice required before filing.
Without Form 8833: U.S. tax on $150,000 U.S. salary Full U.S. income tax applies. No Korean tax on U.S. salary under treaty if treaty residency = U.S. (but tie-breaker may say Korea). Complexity requires CPA analysis.
U.S. Side
Without a treaty claim: SPT met → Form 1040 → U.S. salary fully taxable in U.S. Korean accounts (apartment rental income, bank interest) must also be reported. FBAR required for Korean accounts over $10,000.
Korean Side
NTS may view as Korean resident based on family/property in Korea — requiring worldwide income report including U.S. salary. Korean FTC for U.S. taxes paid on U.S. salary would reduce Korean tax on that income.
Case 03 Korean Executive Rotating Between Seoul and U.S. — Treaty Tie-Breaker Dual Resident → Treaty: Korea

A senior Korean executive spends 150 days in the U.S. (for business meetings and oversight) and 200 days in Korea. Permanent home in Seoul. Corporate apartment in New York (temporary). Family in Seoul. No U.S. visa issues — on L-1.

U.S. Residency Analysis
SPT: 3-year weighted formula. If 150 days/year for 3 years: 150 + 50 (150 × ⅓) + 25 (150 × ⅙) = 225 ≥ 183. SPT MET. U.S. tax resident under domestic law.
Korean Residency Analysis
200 days in Korea ≥ 183 → Korean resident under single-year rule. Also likely domicile in Korea (permanent home, family). Korean tax resident under domestic law.
Treaty Tie-Breaker Result
Test 1 (Permanent home): Seoul apartment = permanent home. New York apartment = temporary corporate accommodation — likely not "permanent home." Result: Korea. U.S.-source compensation for work performed in the U.S. is taxable in the U.S. under the treaty. Korean-source income (Korean salary) taxable only in Korea. Both countries apply FTC to prevent double taxation on overlapping income. Must file Form 8833 with U.S. return + check with Korean NTS on worldwide income reporting requirements. L-1 immigration risk: significant — consult immigration attorney before filing Form 8833.
Case 04 Korean-American (U.S. Citizen) — Extended Stay in Korea (New 2026 Rule) U.S. Always + Korea New Rule

A Korean-American U.S. citizen visits Korea from July 1, 2025 through March 31, 2026 (274 consecutive days spanning two calendar years). U.S. income: $0 during Korea stay. Korean income: Korean bank interest, no employment income.

2026 New Korean Residency Rule — Cross-Year Analysis
U.S. citizenship: always a U.S. tax resident Form 1040 required; worldwide income
Korean days 2025 (July 1 – Dec 31): 184 days Under old rule: 184 < 183 (2025 alone) → NR for 2025. Wait — 184 > 183. Actually Korean resident in 2025 under single-year rule too.
If stay had been August 1 – March 31 (242 consecutive days): 152 days in 2025 + 90 days in 2026 Old rule: 152 < 183 in 2025 (NR); 90 < 183 in 2026 (NR). New 2026 rule: 242 consecutive days ≥ 183 → Korean resident in both 2025 and 2026.
Result under new 2026 Korean rule Even without meeting the single-year 183-day test, the cross-year consecutive stay triggers Korean tax residency
U.S. Side
U.S. citizen → always Form 1040 → worldwide income. Korean bank interest must be reported. FBAR for Korean accounts. FEIE may apply to any Korean earned income ($132,900 exclusion for 2026) if 330-day physical presence test is met. FTC alternative for Korean taxes paid.
Korean Side — New 2026 Rule Impact
The new cross-year rule means this Korean-American may now be a Korean tax resident in years where the single-year 183-day rule was not met — potentially for both 2025 and 2026 simultaneously. Korean worldwide income reporting may be required. Overseas account reporting (해외금융계좌) for U.S. accounts over 50M KRW. Consult Korean tax counsel before extended Korea stays that cross December 31.

Common Mistakes 자주 발생하는 오류

  • 1 Green card holders not filing U.S. taxes while living in Korea, assuming Korean tax compliance is sufficient. The green card creates a permanent U.S. tax resident status that exists independently of Korean tax residency. Both obligations must be met simultaneously. Korean tax payments do not substitute for or satisfy U.S. filing requirements — they only reduce U.S. tax through the Foreign Tax Credit.
  • 2 Not knowing about the new 2026 Korean cross-year 183-day rule. Korean-Americans who split their year between the U.S. and Korea — previously safe from Korean residency if they stayed fewer than 183 days in a single calendar year — may now be Korean tax residents under the new rule if their consecutive Korea presence spans a December 31 year-end and totals 183+ days across two years. Extended family visits, sabbaticals, and "semi-retirement in Korea" arrangements require new analysis under the 2026 amendment.
  • 3 Filing Form 8833 as a green card holder without immigration counsel. The immigration risk of claiming treaty non-residency while holding a green card cannot be overstated. A treaty-based non-resident claim is a written statement filed with the IRS that USCIS can access — it is evidence that the green card holder does not consider the U.S. their primary residence. This can be used to deny re-entry or initiate abandonment proceedings. Always involve an immigration attorney before any Form 8833 filing.
  • 4 Assuming the treaty tie-breaker eliminates FBAR and FATCA obligations. The treaty affects income tax treatment — it does not affect Bank Secrecy Act FBAR requirements. A person who claims Korean treaty residency still owes FBAR reporting for all foreign financial accounts (including Korean accounts) if they hold U.S. person status under the Bank Secrecy Act (which includes all green card holders and citizens regardless of treaty position).
  • 5 Not using the Foreign Tax Credit — paying full income tax to both countries on the same income. Dual residents who do not file Form 1116 (U.S. FTC) or claim the Korean equivalent credit effectively pay full income tax twice on the same earnings. The FTC is the primary mechanism for eliminating this double taxation and is almost always applicable when income is taxed by both countries.
  • 6 Not understanding that both arrival and departure days count in Korea's 183-day calculation. Korea's 183-day residency test counts both the day of arrival and the day of departure as full days of Korean presence. A person who arrives July 1 and departs December 31 has been present for 184 days (July 1 through December 31 inclusive) — meeting the Korean 183-day threshold by 1 day.
  • 7 Not reporting the 해외금융계좌 (Korean overseas account reporting) as Korean residents with U.S. accounts. Korean tax residents who have foreign financial accounts (including U.S. bank or brokerage accounts) with aggregate balances exceeding 50 million KRW (approximately $37,000) at any point during the year must file the overseas financial account report with the NTS by June 30. Korean residents with U.S. investment accounts, 401(k) balances accessible, or U.S. bank accounts may be subject to this Korean reporting obligation.
  • 8 Missing the new 2026 Korean overseas trust reporting requirement. Korean tax residents who established or maintained any overseas trust at any point during 2025 must file the new "Overseas Trust Statement" with the NTS by June 30, 2026. This is a brand-new requirement under the 2024 Korean Tax Law Amendment — it affects Korean residents with U.S. living trusts, U.S. estate planning trusts, offshore account structures, or any other foreign trust arrangement.

Hanmi CPA Insight

Practitioner's Note

Dual residency between the U.S. and Korea is not a problem to be solved — it is a condition to be managed. The U.S.–Korea Tax Treaty and the Foreign Tax Credit exist precisely because both countries anticipated that individuals would be subject to both tax systems simultaneously. When properly applied, these mechanisms eliminate most double taxation. The problem is not the dual residency itself — it is the failure to comply with both sets of obligations simultaneously, which creates delinquency on one side while being current on the other.

The 2026 Korean cross-year 183-day rule is the most significant Korean tax change affecting Korean-Americans in years. Previously, a Korean-American who split the year evenly (6 months in Korea, 6 months in the U.S.) could avoid Korean tax residency by keeping each calendar year under 183 days. The new rule eliminates that gap — 183 consecutive days spanning December 31 now triggers Korean residency regardless of how the days fall within individual calendar years. Families planning extended Korea visits for retirement, caregiving, or "snowbird" arrangements should model this rule explicitly before committing to a stay that crosses year-end.

The green card situation remains the most consequential and most commonly mishandled. A green card holder who has lived in Korea for 5+ years without filing U.S. taxes does not have a tax problem — they have a tax problem, an FBAR problem, and a potential immigration problem, all simultaneously. The delinquent U.S. returns can often be filed under the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures with a 5% penalty on the highest foreign account balance — manageable. The immigration situation depends entirely on the continued validity of the green card and whether it is worth preserving. These two decisions must be made together, by a CPA and an immigration attorney working in coordination, not sequentially.

Hanmi CPA · Dual U.S.–Korea Tax Residency — 2026
This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or immigration advice.
Korean tax law changes described herein are based on the 2024 Korean Tax Law Amendment effective January 1, 2026. Consult both a U.S. CPA and Korean tax counsel for individual situations.